Skip to content

Use experimental prefix only for old Swift versions #190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MaxDesiatov
Copy link
Contributor

experimental- prefix is no longer needed with Swift 6.0 and later versions, let's update README.md accordingly

`experimental-` prefix is no longer needed with Swift 6.0 and later versions, let's update `README.md` accordingly
@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 26, 2025
@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov requested a review from euanh February 26, 2025 11:05
@MaxDesiatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci test

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov marked this pull request as draft March 7, 2025 09:05
- Merge from `main`, probably a good idea to start with.
- Only add `experimental-` prefix to success message when running under
Swift 5.x. Under 6.0 and later, you'll just get the correct message
based on your Swift version:
    ```
    All done! Install the newly generated SDK with this command:
swift sdk install
/home/xtremek/Programming/xtremekforever/swift-sdk-generator/Bundles/6.1-
    RELEASE_ubuntu_jammy_x86_64.artifactbundle

After that, use the newly installed SDK when building with this command:
    swift build --swift-sdk 6.1-RELEASE_ubuntu_jammy_x86_64
    ```
- Added more info to the `Swift SDK Distribution` section of the README
on how to generate checksums.

Let me know what you think, maybe some good inclusions or could use some
tweaks.

---------

Co-authored-by: Mishal Shah <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Euan Harris <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Desiatov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: xavgru12 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants